Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
S D Med ; 75(12): 542-544, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259256

ABSTRACT

The pathophysiology and predictability of radial artery thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 is not fully understood. We report a case of thumb and index finger gangrene and multiple digit amputations secondary to digital artery occlusion after radial artery cannulation in a patient admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and encephalopathy. The exact association, causality, and potential hand manifestations in this patient population is unclear at this time, but is of particular interest in the current state of the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thumb , Humans , Thumb/surgery , Radial Artery/surgery , Fingers/surgery , Fingers/blood supply , Amputation, Surgical
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 40: 227.e3-227.e4, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1060839

ABSTRACT

Cold environments can trigger a variety of conditions, which, in their acute phase often present to the Emergency Department. Primary acrocyanosis is a distinct, rare condition which may be missed resulting in misdiagnosis and mismanagement. Primary acrocyanosis is a peripheral vascular disorder defined by painless, symmetrical discoloration of the distal appendages and uniquely characterized by persistence of the skin color changes after cold exposure. We present a case of a 24-year-old female who presented to the Emergency Department with peripheral cyanosis after cold exposure and was eventually diagnosed with primary acrocyanosis by Rheumatology. The prognosis for primary acrocyanosis is quite good in comparison to other acrosyndromes and once secondary causes of acrocyanosis have been ruled, out can be managed conservatively with lifestyle modifications and potential follow-up with Rheumatology.


Subject(s)
Cyanosis/diagnosis , Fingers/blood supply , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cold Temperature , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Young Adult
4.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 96(4): 989-1005, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1039483

ABSTRACT

Pernio or chilblains is characterized by erythema and swelling at acral sites (eg, toes and fingers), typically triggered by cold exposure. Clinical and histopathologic features of pernio are well described, but the pathogenesis is not entirely understood; vasospasm and a type I interferon (IFN-I) immune response are likely involved. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, dermatologists have observed an increase in pernio-like acral eruptions. Direct causality of pernio due to COVID-19 has not been established in many cases because of inconsistent testing methods (often negative results) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, a form of COVID-19‒associated pernio (also called COVID toes) is probable because of increased occurrence, frequently in young patients with no cold exposure or a history of pernio, and reports of skin biopsies with positive SARS-CoV-2 immunohistochemistry. PubMed was searched between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020 for publications using the following keywords: pernio, chilblain, and acral COVID-19. On the basis of our review of the published literature, we speculate that several unifying cutaneous and systemic mechanisms may explain COVID-19‒associated pernio: (1) SARS-CoV-2 cell infection occurs through the cellular receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 mediated by transmembrane protease serine 2, subsequently affecting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with an increase in the vasoconstricting, pro-inflammatory, and prothrombotic angiotensin II pathway. (2) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 cell infection triggers an immune response with robust IFN-I release in patients predisposed to COVID-19‒associated pernio. (3) Age and sex discrepancies correlated with COVID-19 severity and manifestations, including pernio as a sign of mild disease, are likely explained by age-related immune and vascular differences influenced by sex hormones and genetics, which affect susceptibility to viral cellular infection, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system balance, and the IFN-I response.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chilblains , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Vasoconstriction , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/physiopathology , Chilblains/immunology , Chilblains/physiopathology , Chilblains/virology , Disease Susceptibility , Fingers/blood supply , Humans , Renin-Angiotensin System/physiology , Toes/blood supply
6.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0237694, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-771808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2) is responsible for the infectious respiratory disease called COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). In response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic, point-of-care (POC) tests have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgG and IgM, to SARS-CoV-2 virus in human whole blood. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the performance of two POC tests, COVID-PRESTO® and COVID-DUO®, compared to the gold standard, RT-PCR (real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction). METHODS: RT-PCR testing of SARS-Cov-2 was performed from nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected in adult patients visiting the infectious disease department at the hospital (Orléans, France). Capillary whole blood (CWB) samples from the fingertip taken at different time points after onset of the disease were tested with POC tests. The specificity and sensitivity of the rapid test kits compared to test of reference (RT-PCR) were calculated. RESULTS: Among 381 patients with symptoms of COVID-19 who went to the hospital for a diagnostic, 143 patients were RT-PCR negative. Results of test with POC tests were all negative for these patients, indicating a specificity of 100% for both POC tests. In the RT-PCR positive subgroup (n = 238), 133 patients were tested with COVID-PRESTO® and 129 patients were tested with COVID-DUO® (24 patients tested with both). The further the onset of symptoms was from the date of collection, the greater the sensitivity. The sensitivity of COVID-PRESTO® test ranged from 10.00% for patients having experienced their 1st symptoms from 0 to 5 days ago to 100% in patients where symptoms had occurred more than 15 days before the date of tests. For COVID-DUO® test, the sensitivity ranged from 35.71% [0-5 days] to 100% (> 15 days). CONCLUSION: COVID-PRESTO® and DUO® POC tests turned out to be very specific (none false positive) and to be sensitive enough after 15 days from onset of symptom. These easy to use IgG/IgM combined test kits are the first ones allowing a screening with CWB sample, by typing from a finger prick. These rapid tests are particularly interesting for screening in low resource settings.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Immunoassay/methods , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Adult , Aged , Antibody Specificity , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines , Capillaries , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Fingers/blood supply , Humans , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Point-of-Care Testing , Prospective Studies , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
10.
J Hand Surg Am ; 45(6): 518-522, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-228547

ABSTRACT

As coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) continues to cause an immense burden on the global health care systems, it is crucial to understand the breadth of this disease process. Recent reports identified hypercoagulability in a subset of critically ill patients and extremity ischemia in an even smaller cohort. Because abnormal coagulation parameters and extremity ischemia have been shown to correlate with poor disease prognosis, understanding how to treat these patients is crucial. To better describe the identification and management of this phenomenon, we present 2 cases of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who developed fingertip ischemia while in the intensive care unit.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Fingers/blood supply , Ischemia/drug therapy , Ischemia/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Betacoronavirus , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/physiopathology , COVID-19 , Combined Modality Therapy , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care/methods , Critical Illness/therapy , Disease Progression , Fatal Outcome , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Ischemia/physiopathology , Male , Pandemics , Patient Discharge , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/drug therapy , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Sampling Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL